indonesian economic system?

Indonesian economic system is a oriented economy to the Godhead is One God (the introduction of ethics and moral religion, not materialism); Humanity a fair and civilized (not to blackmail or exploitation); coalescence Indonesia (the introduction of togetherness, the principle of kinship, nationalism and socio - democracy in the socio-economic); populist (the economic life people and intent of the people live); and Social Justice (equality / emancipation, prosperity public prosperity is not the major one-person)

Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution is the main article rest on economic system based on the Pancasila, completely, on the article 18-article, 23, 27 (paragraph 2) and 34.

Platform-normative guidance imperative This noble and moral ethics, which places people in a position, as holder of the sovereignty of the people, the people as people who honored the Lord, who lives in the companionship of each other, sharing mutual help and share work.

Many persons confess people. Some do it correctly in the interest of the people but have also done so in the interest of a private or group. The latter is certainly an action that is not commendable. However, a more dangerous than that is that many of them, either point is that they are less fully understand the meaning and significance of the people and the dimensions of environment.

Is a political conception of the people, not statistics or draft arithmetic, people do not have to mean the entire population. People is the common people, people are people. The people associated with the interests of the public, with the interests of different people-one. The people have any connection with the interests of collective or shared interest. It's called the public interest or the public wants, which is different from the private interest and private wants. It is also the old contrast between individual privacy and public needs (dementia of the public domain). This analog with the understanding that the social preference is different with the results of the Answer or a combination of individual preferences. The term has relevance to the people of the things that are public

Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution must be maintained. Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution article is about the economy that is in Chapter XIV of the 1945 Constitution, entitled Social Welfare. Social welfare is not inseparable from the ideals of freedom. Place with Article 33 in 1945 under the title of the chapter of Social Welfare, the national economic development is to be empty on increasing social welfare. Improvement of social welfare is a test for successful development, not merely per-plants, especially economic development of physical grandeur. Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution is a glorious chapter, the article with the interests of society, without ignoring the interests of individual people. Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution is economic restructuring clause, article for the economic structural imbalance.

is not easy for them to understand Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution has no national platform, without having populist ideology, or without understanding the ideals of nationalism and socio-democracy at this time remain relevant. They (some economists junior) presumably does not like trying to understand the meaning of the economy are developed as joint venture based on a family basis (Article 33 paragraph 1). Togetherness is a principle of mutuality and kinship or brotherhood is boarders chap (non-kinship or kinship), religious language is the spirit of solidarity and social collective. M. Umer Chapra (2001) even stressed that the sanction brotherhood is one of the goals in the development economy,. Brotherhood to be the strength of synergy for mutual economic cooperation, mutual help and share work.

Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution does not have any contribution and the economic at this time, in the history of this Republic. Not Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution which we fall into the traps of debt (debt-trap) that vicious this. Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution does not do anything wrong, not weaken the position of the Indonesian economy so that we were dashed down by the financial crisis. Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution does not follow any one in the present economic crisis is prolonged. Not Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution through the Bank Indonesia and robbery BLBI. Article 33 is not also make the economy mastered and under neighboring countries (L / C guaranteed Indonesia Singapore). Article 33 is not a gap in the economy (which later formed the sharp social inequalities and encouraging social disintegration or national), sweep aside people and economy. Article 33 is not also make the distribution of income and leave the lame Indonesia of a trickle-up mechanism is exploitative of the people, that the paralyzed (dis empowerment) and the impoverishment of the people (impoverishment). Then, why we make the scapegoat Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution and thus indulge in glorification globalization and free-market full of traps for us? Article 33 does not prevent, let alone forbid us to take forward and global role in shaping a new economic order mondial.

Main error we adults is located on the attitude of a very up-market free. We have cause to repent as a free-market sovereign, the people's sovereignty and friction. We have cause to repent the market as new idols.

We may wonder will this admiration, said the Cabinet should be friendly to the market, the criteria should be economic ministers who are friends to the market. Even a group of economists expect a President Megawati also be friendly to the market. Why do we have to err far.

Why not vice versa that should market are the people, farmers, fishermen, etc. 1)

1) Why is the market in Japan can be arranged with the farmers are Japanese, so that rice in Japan achieving a per pound price rupiah
Rp. 30.000, - the Japanese importers do not import cheap rice from overseas. Why we must also buried farmers
us, even when we're harvesting the rice farmers, we are importing cheap rice from overseas?

Who is this market? Not at this time in the market is simply (1) the group / authority funds (recipient of funds from abroad / comprador, KKN actors, including the robber BLBI, dst), (2) the authorities stock of goods (including penimbun and pengijon ); (3) the speculator (both in the public markets and capital markets) and (4) where is the last of the common people buy weak. On the substance that is friendly to the market friendly to the first three groups as the main actor (read: the authorities and the market determines the market).

Therefore, the market should still be controlled, restrained, not to fully rely-on, 2) but rather market, as a means of economic development, which should serve the country. Confusion is the large market as omniscient and omnipotent, so is able to overcome the structural imbalance. Is the naive free market is real. The real embargo is the fact, asked to protection, unfair competition, monopoly (Copyrights, patents, intellectual property rights), not the exception of embargo and economic sanctions as a political and distortion which dominate the market.